2种用药方案对稻田主要天敌群落结构影响的差异
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

农业部公益性行业专项(200903033)、 江西省自然科学基金项目(2009GQN0059)、 江西省青年科学家培养对象资助项目和江西省科技支撑计划项目(20112BBF60035)


Differential impact of two treatments on the main natural enemies community structure in rice fields
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    通过田间试验,观察并分析2种用药方案对稻田害虫天敌群落结构影响的差异。结果表明:噻嗪酮与氯虫苯甲酰胺混配(用药方案Ⅰ)后施用,田间害虫天敌的科数和虫数均多于吡虫啉与毒死蜱混配(用药方案Ⅱ)后施用的田块; 用药方案Ⅰ处理的田间天敌群落香农指数和均匀性指数均显著高于用药方案Ⅱ处理的田块; 用药方案Ⅰ处理田间捕食类天敌狼蛛科和肖蛸科的优势度显著高于用药方案Ⅱ处理和对照; 用药方案Ⅰ处理田间茧蜂科和皿蛛科的优势度显著低于用药方案Ⅱ处理,说明以噻嗪酮与氯虫苯甲酰胺混配后防治稻飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟比用吡虫啉与毒死蜱混配防治对天敌更加安全。

    Abstract:

    The impacts of two treatments on the natural enemy community diversity was evaluated through field test. The results showed that the number of family and population of natural enemies in the plots using buprofezin and chlorantraniliprole (treatment Ⅰ) was larger than that using imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos (treatment Ⅱ). The Shannon-Wiener diversity index and evenness index of the plots with treatment Ⅰ were significant higher than those with treatment Ⅱ. The relative dominance of Lycosidae and Tetragnathidae in the plots with treatment Ⅰ was significantly higher that with treatment Ⅱ and that in the control plots. The relative dominance of Braconidae and Linyphiidae was significantly lower with treatment Ⅰ than that with treatment Ⅱ. The results suggested that using buprofezin and chlorantraniliprole to control rice planthopper and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis will be safer than using imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos. 

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐雪亮,姚英娟,朱雪晶,舒平平,李永平.2种用药方案对稻田主要天敌群落结构影响的差异[J].华中农业大学学报,2012,31(5):613-616

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-22
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: