高效固相微萃取管在环境水中痕量多环芳烃现场采样检测的应用
作者:
作者单位:

华中农业大学食品科学技术学院/环境食品学教育部重点实验室/ 果蔬加工与品质调控湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430070

作者简介:

郑美杰,E-mail:mjzheng2021@163.com

通讯作者:

李秀娟,E-mail:lixiujuan@mail.hzau.edu.cn

中图分类号:

O658

基金项目:

海南省科技厅重点研发计划项目(ZDYF2021XDNY304);湖北省农业科技创新项目(2019-620-000-001-31)


On-site sampling and detection of trace polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental water with highly efficient solid-phase microextraction tubes
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Food Science and Technology/Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology/Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Fruit & Vegetable Processing & Quality Control, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为实现环境水中痕量污染物的现场采样,研制大容量固相微萃取(solid-phase microextraction,SPME)萃取管,构建现场SPME(on-site SPME)采样装置,以邻苯二甲酸酯和多环芳烃(polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,PAHs)为研究对象,采用气相色谱-氢火焰离子化检测器,评价萃取管和on-site SPME装置的性能。结果显示:萃取管性能稳定、重现性好,单根萃取管的萃取量为针式萃取头的13~31倍;采样装置组装灵活、携带方便;使用3根萃取管采样装置建立的on-site SPME方法对水中4种PAHs的检出限为0.01~0.04 ng/L,灵敏度较单根萃取管提高6~14倍,比针式萃取头提高36~53倍;不同加标水平下回收率为92.0%~115.7%,相对标准偏差为1.5%~13.1%。研究结果表明,该装置富集能力强、组装灵活、能够自动化采样,可以用于环境水中不同污染物的高效监测。

    Abstract:

    A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) tube with large-capacity was developed and an on-site SPME sampling device was constructed to realize on-site sampling of trace pollutants in environmental water. Phthalates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were used to evaluate the performance of the SPME tubes and the on-site SPME device with gas chromatography-hydrogen flame ionization detector. The results showed that the extraction tube had stable performance and good reproducibility, and the extraction amount of a single extraction tube was 13-31 times that of a needle extraction head. The sampling device is flexible to be assembled and easy to be carried. The limit of detection of the on-site SPME method established with a sampling device of three extraction tubes was 0.01-0.04 ng/L for four types of PAHs in water. The sensitivity of the on-site SPME was 6-14 times higher than that of a single extraction tube and 36-53 times higher than that of a needle extraction head. The rate of recovery at different spiked levels was 92.0% to 115.7%, with a relative standard deviation of 1.5% to 13.1%. It is indicated that the constructed device has strong enrichment capacity, flexible assembly, and can be automated and used for efficient monitoring of different pollutants in environmental water.

    图1 现场采样装置Fig.1 Device for on-site sampling
    图2 高效SPME装置现场采样图Fig.2 On-site sampling with the efficient SPME device
    图3 萃取管使用寿命Fig.3 Lifetime of the extraction tube
    图4 不同萃取装置对PAEs(A)和PAHs(B)富集能力对比Fig.4 Comparison of the enrichment capacity of PAEs(A) and PAHs(B) by different extraction devices
    图5 抽水泵对水中PAHs萃取效率的影响Fig.5 Effect of the water pump on the extractionefficiency of PAHs in water
    图6 萃取时间对水中PAHs萃取量的影响Fig.6 Effect of the extraction time on the extraction efficiency of PAHs in water
    图7 南湖水样GC-FID色谱图Fig.7 GC-FID chromatograms of the South Lake water
    表 1 萃取管制备重现性Table 1 Reproducibility of SPME tubes
    表 2 不同SPME/GC-FID方法的线性范围、线性决定系数、检出限及定量限Table 2 Linear ranges, R2, LODs and LOQs of different SPME/GC-FID methods
    表 3 On site SPME/GC-FID方法加标回收率及精密度Table 3 The recoveries and precision of the on-site SPME/GC-FID method
    表 4 On-site SPME/GC-FID检测方法与其他方法对比Table 4 Comparison of the on-site SPME/GC-FID method with other methods
    表 5 不同采样方式所得分析物浓度Table 5 Concentrations (mean ± SD) of analytes obtained by different sampling techniques
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郑美杰,黄语,李秀娟.高效固相微萃取管在环境水中痕量多环芳烃现场采样检测的应用[J].华中农业大学学报,2025,44(1):105-112

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:7
  • 下载次数: 27
  • HTML阅读次数: 9
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-03
文章二维码