长江中游典型稻田种植模式的资源利用率及综合效益
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

江西农业大学生态科学研究中心/江西省作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室,南昌330045

作者简介:

杨滨娟,E-mail:yangbinjuan@jxau.edu.cn

通讯作者:

黄国勤,E-mail:hgqjxes@sina.com

中图分类号:

S344;S38

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(32160528);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300208);江西省现代农业产业体系-稻田综合种养产业技术体系(JXARS-12)


Comparative study on resource utilization and comprehensive benefit of typical rice planting patterns in middle reaches of Yangtze River
Author:
Affiliation:

Research Center on Ecological Sciences,Jiangxi Agricultural University/ Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology,Ecology and Genetic Breeding of Jiangxi Province,Nanchang 330045,China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究长江中游稻田不同种植模式的综合效益,筛选适合长江中游地区利用的高效种植模式,选取紫云英-早稻-晚稻(CK,CRR)、紫云英-早稻-甘薯||晚大豆(CRI)、油菜-早稻-晚稻(RRR)、油菜-早稻-甘薯||晚大豆(RRI)和马铃薯-早稻-晚稻(PRR) 5种长江中游典型稻田种植模式,通过2018年9月至2020年12月连续的田间试验,比较长江中游典型种植模式的资源利用率和综合效益,结果显示:2 a间,各处理的年总光能利用率均高于对照处理,除2020年油菜-早稻-晚稻外,各处理的年总光能利用率显著高出对照处理10.98%~35.37%和22.22%~50.00%(P<0.05)。2 a间,油菜-早稻-甘薯||晚大豆的周年光能生产效率和年总光能利用率较高,其次是紫云英-早稻-甘薯||晚大豆。2 a间,除CRI外,其余3个处理的周年积温生产效率均显著高出对照处理8.28%~25.44%(2019年)和21.09%~26.78%(2020年)(P<0.05)。冬种紫云英处理(CRR、CRI)的年有效积温利用率均较高,处理CRI和处理CRR(紫云英-早稻-晚稻)表现较好,提高了积温利用率。连续2 a均是处理CRI的综合效益加权关联度最大,分别为0.75和0.81,综合效益最优。在综合考虑产量、温室气体排放、土壤质量、资源利用效率和综合效益的情况下,紫云英-早稻-甘薯||晚大豆模式表现较好。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the comprehensive benefits of different planting patterns in paddy fields in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and screen the efficient planting patterns suitable for the middle reaches of the Yangtze River,five typical planting patterns in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River were selected.The resource utilization and comprehensive benefits of typical planting patterns in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River were compared through two consecutive years of field experiments.The results showed that in two years,the annual total light energy utilization rate of each treatments were higher than that of the control treatment,except the treatment RRR in 2020.The annual total light energy utilization rate of each treatments were significantly higher than that of the control treatment 10.98%-35.37% and 22.22%-50.00%.In two years,the anniversary of light energy and annual total light energy utilization efficiency under the treatment of RRI were higher,the second is treatment of CRI.During two years,the annual accumulated temperature production efficiency of the other three treatments were significantly higher than that of the control 8.28%-25.44% (2019) and 21.09%-26.78% (2020),except for the treatment of CRI.The effective accumulated temperature of utilization rate under the models of winter milk vetch were higher,the treatments of CRI and CRR have good performance,improve the utilization rate of accumulated temperature.For consecutive two years,comprehensive benefit weighted correlation degree under the treatment of CRI was 0.75 and 0.81 respectively,the comprehensive benefit was optimal.To sum up,in consideration of high yield,low greenhouse gas emissions,high soil quality,high resource utilization efficiency and the most optimal comprehensive benefit,the model of Chinese milk vetch-early rice-sweet potato||late soybean had good performance,which played an important role in the optimization of paddy planting pattern in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.

    表 8 稻田不同种植模式综合效益评价指标的等权关联系数Table 8 Correlation coefficients of comprehensive benefit evaluation indicators of different cropping patterns in paddy field
    表 1 冬季作物秸秆还田量Table 1 Quantity of crop straw mulching in winter
    表 7 稻田不同种植模式的综合效益评价的无量纲化值Table 7 Dimensionless values of comprehensive benefits evaluation indexes of different croppingpatterns in paddy field
    表 5 不同种植模式的土地利用率Table 5 Land use efficiency of different cropping systems
    图1 试验期间日平均气温与降水量变化Fig.1 Daily mean temperature and precipitation changes during the test period
    表 2 田间管理Table 2 Field management
    表 9 不同种植模式的综合效益评价(2019-2020)Table 9 Comprehensive benefits evaluation of different cropping patterns(2019-2020)
    表 6 稻田不同种植模式的综合效益评价指标初始值Table 6 Raw data of comprehensive benefits evaluation indexes of different cropping patterns in paddy field
    表 4 不同种植模式的积温生产效率与周年利用率Table 4 Growing degree days(GDD) production efficiency and annual use efficiency of different cropping systems
    表 3 不同种植模式的光能生产效率与周年利用率Table 3 Solar radiation production efficiency and annual use efficiency of different cropping systems
    参考文献
    [1] 陈阜,梁志杰,陈述泉.多熟制的发展前景[J].世界农业,1997(6):18-20.CHEN F,LIANG Z J,CHEN S Q.The development prospect of multiple cropping[J].The world’s agriculture,1997,(6):18-20(in Chinese).
    [2] 张帆.冬季作物-双季稻轮作模式资源利用效率及经济效益比较研究[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(1):87-95.ZHANG F.Comparative study on resource utilization efficiency and economic benefits of winter crop-double cropping rice rotation system in Hunan Province[J].Journal of agricultural resources and environment,2021,38(1):87-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [3] 龚松玲,曹培,高珍珍,等.种植模式对南方作物产量及资源利用效率的影响[J].作物杂志,2021(1):68-73.GONG S L,CAO P,GAO Z Z,et al.Effects of cropping patterns on crop yield and resource utilization efficiency in Southern China[J].Crops,2021(1):68-73 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [4] WANG G P,LI Y B,HAN Y C,et al.Resource use efficiency in a cotton-wheat double-cropping system in the Yellow River Valley of China[J].Experimental agriculture,2020,56(3):422-439.
    [5] 黄国勤.中国耕作学[M].北京:新华出版社,2001.HUANG G Q.Chinese agronomy[M].Beijing:Xinhua Publishing House,2001 (in Chinese).
    [6] 杨滨娟,黄国勤,陈洪俊,等.稻田复种轮作模式的生态经济效益综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(1):112-120.YANG B J,HUANG G Q,CHEN H J,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of eco-economic benefits of multi-crop rotation in paddy field systems[J].Chinese journal of eco-agriculture,2016,24(1):112-120(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [7] 李鹏红,吴兵,高玉红,等.覆膜种植模式对旱地胡麻经济效益的影响分析——基于熵权灰色关联耦合的综合评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(4):180-188.LI P H,WU B,GAO Y H,et al.Effect of plastic film mulching on economic benefit of oil flax in dryland:comprehensive evaluation based on entropy weight and grey correlation coupling[J].Journal of arid land resources and environment,2021,35(4):180-188(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [8] 周海波,付江凡,王长松,等.江西省双季稻田三熟制种植模式综合效益评价[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(4):294-299.ZHOU H B,FU J F,WANG C S,et al.Comprehensive benefit evaluation of triple cropping system in double cropping rice field in Jiangxi Province[J].Jiangsu agricultural sciences,2019,47(4):294-299 (in Chinese).
    [9] 崔爱花,周丽华,杨滨娟,等.红壤旱地不同复种方式的生态功能评价[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):456-464.CUI A H,ZHOU L H,YANG B J,et al.Ecological evaluation of different multiple cropping systems in red soil drylands[J].Chinese journal of applied ecology,2017,28(2):456-464 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [10] 古翼瑞.成都平原以水稻为核心的种植模式综合效益分析与评价[D].成都:四川农业大学,2016.GU Y R.The chengdu plain with a core of rice planting pattern comprehensive benefit analysis and evaluation[D].Chengdu:Sichuan Agricultural University,2016 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [11] 李淑娅,田少阳,袁国印,等.长江中游不同玉稻种植模式产量及资源利用效率的比较研究[J].作物学报,2015,41(10):1537-1547.LI S Y,TIAN S Y,YUAN G Y,et al.Comparison of yield and resource utilization efficiency among different maize and rice cropping systems in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River[J].Acta agronomica sinica,2015,41(10):1537-1547 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [12] 王美云,任天志,赵明,等.双季青贮玉米模式物质生产及资源利用效率研究[J].作物学报,2007,33(8):1316-1323.WANG M Y,REN T Z,ZHAO M,et al.Matter production and resources use efficiency of double-cropping silage maize system[J].Acta agronomica sinica,2007,33(8):1316-1323 (in chinese with english abstract).
    [13] 侯连涛,江晓东,韩宾,等.不同覆盖处理对冬小麦气体交换参数及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(9):58-63.HOU L T,JIANG X D,HAN B,et al.Effects of different mulching treatments on the gas exchange parameters and water use efficiency of winter wheat[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2006,22(9):58-63 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [14] 骆世明.农业生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.LUO S M.Agroecology[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2001 (in Chinese).
    [15] 邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2005.DENG J L.Basic method of grey system[M].Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press,2005 (in Chinese).
    [16] 黄国勤,钟树福,刘隆旺.鄱阳湖旱地耕作制度的模糊综合评判[J].耕作与栽培,1993 (1):7-10.HUANG G Q,ZHONG S F,LIU L W.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of dryland farming system in Poyang Lake[J].Cultivation and cultivation,1993 (1):7-10(in Chinese).
    [17] 张鹏,钟川,周泉,等.不同冬种模式对稻田土壤碳库管理指数的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(8):1163-1171.ZHANG P,ZHONG C,ZHOU Q,et al.Effects of different winter planting patterns on carbon management index of paddy field[J].Chinese journal of eco-agriculture,2019,27(8):1163-1171(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [18] 黄国勤,熊云明,钱海燕,等.稻田轮作系统的生态学分析[J].土壤学报,2006,43(1):69-78.HUANG G Q,XIONG Y M,QIAN H Y,et al.Ecological analysis of crop rotation systems in paddy field[J].Acta pedologica sinica,2006,43(1):69-78 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [19] 于镇超.鄂中北两熟区不同种植模式资源利用效率评价[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2019.YU Z C.Evaluation on resource utilization efficiency of different cropping systems in double cropping area of north central Hubei Province[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2019(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [20] ZHANG H,JING W J,ZHAO B H,et al.Alternative fertilizer and irrigation practices improve rice yield and resource use efficiency by regulating source-sink relationships[J].Field crops research,2021,265:108-124.
    [21] SU Z E,LIU Z J,BAI F,et al.Cultivar selection can increase yield potential and resource use efficiency of spring maize to adapt to climate change in Northeast China[J].Journal of integrative agriculture,2021,20(2):371-382.
    [22] 王兰.红壤旱地以玉米和大豆为主体的多熟种植模式优化研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2018.WANG L.Research on optimized mode of multiple cropping pattern with corn and soybean as the subject in red soil dryland[D].Nanchang:Jiangxi Agricultural University,2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

杨滨娟,袁嘉欣,胡启良,刘宁,黄瑶,黄国勤.长江中游典型稻田种植模式的资源利用率及综合效益[J].华中农业大学学报,2022,41(6):79-88

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:755
  • 下载次数: 1297
  • HTML阅读次数: 105
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-09
文章二维码