Page 39 - 《华中农业大学学报》2025年第3期

第 3 期 梁盼 等：稻-鸭-虾综合种养模式与其他稻田种养模式效率比较 33

表6 技术效率与生态效率的影响因素评估 表7 不同稻田综合种养模式与水稻单作的比较
Table 6 Assessment of factors influencing Table 7 Comparison of different integrated rice farming
technical efficiency and eco-efficiency models with monocropping rice
因素类别 技术效率 生态效率
因素类别 技术效率 生态效率 Factors 影响因素 Technical Ecological
影响因素 Influencing factors
Factors Technical Ecological category efficiency efficiency
Influencing factors
category efficiency efficiency
稻-虾 -0.053 *** -0.178 ***
** *** Rice-crayfish (0.014) (0.017)
-0.025 -0.067 种养模式
性别 Gender
(0.011) (0.016) Integrated rice 稻-鸭 -0.061 -0.109
farming Rice-duck (0.043) (0.067)
0.002 *** 0.004 ***
年龄 Age models
(0.001) (0.001) 稻-鸭-虾 0.163 *** -0.050
户主个人特征
Rice-duck-crayfish (0.047) (0.106)
Household 受教育年限 0.001 -0.001
* ***
head’s per‐ -0.021 -0.065
Education level (0.002) (0.003) 性别 Gender
sonal charac‐ (0.011) (0.016)
teristics 健康状况 -0.000 -0.000
0.001 ** 0.002 ***
Health status (0.000) (0.000) 年龄 Age
户主个人特征 (0.001) (0.001)
环境保护意愿 Household
-0.008 0.022 受教育年限 0.000 0.000
Willingness to protect the head’s person‐
(0.010) (0.015) Education level (0.002) (0.003)
environment al characteris‐
tics 健康状况 -0.000 0.000
家庭总人口数
-0.002 -0.007 *** Health status (0.000) (0.000)
Total number of family
(0.002) (0.003)
members 环境保护意愿 Willingness -0.012 0.009
家庭年总收入 to protect the environment (0.010) (0.014)
0.005 *** -0.003 *
Annual total household in‐ 家庭总人口数 Total num‐ -0.002 -0.007 ***
(0.001) (0.002)
come ber of family members (0.002) (0.003)
农户家庭特征
Household 农业补贴 0.047 ** -0.010 家庭年总收入 Annual to‐ 0.005 *** -0.002
characteristics Agricultural subsidy (0.021) (0.021) tal household income (0.001) (0.002)
农户家庭特征
农业保险 -0.038 *** -0.002 农业补贴 0.056 *** 0.012
Household
Agricultural insurance (0.011) (0.016) Agricultural subsidy (0.021) (0.019)
characteristics
农业保险 -0.040 *** -0.012
无人机使用情况 0.020 * -0.069 ***
Agricultural insurance (0.011) (0.015)
The usage status of drones (0.011) (0.016)
无人机使用情况 The us‐ 0.042 *** 0.011
经济指标 经济发展水平
-0.009 *** -0.006 *** age status of drones (0.013) (0.017)
Economic Level of economic develop‐
(0.001) (0.002)
indicator ment 经济指标 经济发展水平 Level of -0.009 *** -0.006 ***
Economic
economic development (0.002) (0.002)
高温热浪 -0.001 0.018 *** indicator
Heatwave (0.003) (0.003)
-0.003 0.015 ***
高温热浪 Heatwave
极端低温 -0.002 ** -0.002 * (0.003) (0.003)
Extreme low temperatures (0.001) (0.001) ** ***
极端低温 Extreme low -0.002 -0.002
temperatures (0.001) (0.001)
平均降雨量 -0.004 *** -0.001
气候因素 Average rainfall (0.001) (0.002) 平均降雨量 -0.005 *** -0.003 **
Climatic 气候因素 Average rainfall (0.001) (0.002)
factors 暴雨 0.014 *** -0.001 Climatic fac‐
Heavy rainstorm (0.003) (0.004) tors 暴雨 0.015 *** 0.006
Heavy rainstorm (0.003) (0.004)
干旱 0.001 -0.004 ***
0.002 * -0.004 ***
Drought (0.001) (0.001) 干旱 Drought
(0.001) (0.001)
样本量 Sample size 1 167 1 167 样本量Sample size 1 167 1 167
R 2 0.118 0.103 R 2 0.139 0.174
注：*、**、***分别表示在 10%、5%、1% 的水平上显著，括号内数据 注：本回归以水稻单作模式为基准组，种养模式部分的回归系数
表示不同模式相对于水稻单作模式的效率变化。Note： In this re‐
为稳健标准误。下表同。Note： *， **， and *** indicate significance at
gression， the monocropping-rice model serves as the reference
the 10%， 5%， and 1% levels， respectively. Values in parentheses rep‐
group， and the coefficients for the integrated rice farming models re‐
resent robust standard errors. The following table is identical. flect the changes in efficiency relative to it.