‘爱媛28号’果实品质综合评价方法的构建
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1果蔬园艺作物种质创新与利用全国重点实验室/华中农业大学园艺林学学院,武汉 430070;2四川省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,成都 610066

作者简介:

杜旌菁,E-mail :du_jingjing@webmail.hzau.edu.cn

通讯作者:

吴巨勋,E-mail:wjxun@mail.hzau.edu.cn

中图分类号:

S666

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFD1200501);宁波市科技计划项目(2024Z273);国家现代农业(柑橘)产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-26)


Construction of method for comprehensively evaluating fruit quality of ‘Ehime Kashi No.28’
Author:
Affiliation:

1National Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Horticultural Crops/College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences,Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070,China;2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment,Sichuan Province Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Chengdu 610066,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对柑橘产业“优质优价”的核心需求,以‘爱媛28号’杂柑为研究对象,基于连续4 a、不同产地采集的284组果实样本,构建1个多样性较高的常规果实品质数据集,在此基础上,建立了1种主观与客观相结合的权重赋分排序法用于果实品质综合评价,并与熵权法(客观评价法)和感官评价法(主观评价法)进行比较。在大样本量、多批次的果实品质综合评价下,相关性分析结果显示,权重赋分排序法与熵权法之间具有极显著的相关性(r=0.923),但是感官评价与以上2种方法相关性较低;通过主要品质指标比较分析明确了权重赋分排序法用于品质综合评价的准确性;在小样本量、单一批次的果实品质综合评价下,这3种方法的评价结果具有较高一致性。本研究所建立的多年份、多产地果实品质数据具有较高的多样性,权重赋分排序法在不同批次和不同样本量比较分析下表现出良好的评价一致性与适用性,具有跨年份和跨区域比较的潜力。

    Abstract:

    Achieving premium pricing for citrus fruits with high-quality is a crucial pathway to enhancing the economic benefits of citrus industry.However,the scientifically and stably comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of citrus remains an area requiring a further investigation.Citrus hybrid ‘Ehime Kashi No.28’ known as Hongmeiren or Jelly orange hybrid citrus was used to construct a highly diverse dataset of conventional fruit quality based on 284 sample groups of fruit collected from various production regions over 4 consecutive years.A comprehensive evaluation model with a weighted scoring method combining subjectivity with objectivity was established based on the dataset constructed.The established method was compared with the entropy weight method as an objective evaluation approach and the sensory evaluation as a subjective evaluation approach.The results of correlation analysis under the comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality with the large-sample and multi-batch dataset showed that there was a highly significant correlation (r=0.923) between the weighted scoring method and the entropy weight method,but the correlation between the sensory evaluation and the two quantitative methods was relatively low.The accuracy of the weighted scoring method for comprehensively evaluating the fruit quality was validated by comparing and analyzing the main indexes of quality.The 3 methods had a high degree of consistency under the controlled conditions with the small-sample and single-batch dataset.It is indicated that the diversity of the dataset of fruit quality with multi-year and multi-origin established is high.The weighted scoring method has a good consistency of evaluation and applicability across different batches and sample sizes,with the potential for the cross-year and cross-regional comparisons.Studies in the future should further validate its robustness and stability with additionally independent datasets,particularly through independent validation across multiple years.It will provide a useful reference for comprehensively evaluating and grading the fruit quality of citrus.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杜旌菁,萧云思,何镇成,伊华林,吴巨勋.‘爱媛28号’果实品质综合评价方法的构建[J].华中农业大学学报,2026,45(4):116-126

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码