“小积分”何以撬动“大治理”:乡村自主性建构的行动框架
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

浙江师范大学 法学院,浙江 金华 321004

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F325

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目“基层政府数字化创新偏差的生成与治理机制研究”(24BZZ061);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“共同富裕的浙江实践与治理创新研究”(22JJD810013)。


How Can “Small Points” Achieve “Great Governance”: An Action Framework for Construction of Rural Autonomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    回归村民自治本位是乡村治理现代化的应有之义。乡村治理的基础是作为治理主体的村民积极主动参与村级公共事务并达成集体行动的选择,培育乡村治理自主性。以我国东部沿海A市L村“红梅指数”运作实践为例,在激励机制下,基于“动机—行为—目标”分析框架,展现了L村积分治理的实践过程、运行机制和实施效果。结果表明:经由“面子”机制的中介作用,积分治理实践具备动力生成、行为塑造和目标管理三大激励条件,能够有效激发乡村治理内生动力,调动村民参与村级公共事务的积极性,克服“集体行动的困境”,实现自治、法治与德治“三治融合”目标。不过,作为一套非正式的制度安排,积分制要想持续推动乡村自治,就必须同我国当前乡村治理的正式制度安排结合起来,形成长效治理机制。积分制在L村的成功实践也不必然表明其在其他地区就能成功复制推广,复刻积分治理成功经验还必须因时因地制宜,将其同当地经济社会发展实际紧密结合起来。

    Abstract:

    Reaffirming the principle of rural residents’ autonomy is an essential component of rural governance modernization. The foundation of rural governance lies in villagers' proactive participation in village-level public affairs as governance actors and their capacity to achieve collective action, thereby cultivating the autonomy of rural governance. Taking the practice of the“ Red Plum Index” in Village L of City A in eastern coastal China as an example, this paper, within the analytical framework of motivation–behavior–goal, presents the practical process, operational mechanism and implementation effects of point-based governance in the village under the incentive mechanism. The research results indicate that through the mediating effect of the “mian zi” mechanism, the practice of points-based governance establishes three core incentive conditions---motivation generation, behavior shaping and goal management---which effectively stimulate the endogenous momentum of rural governance, ecourage villagers' active participation in public affairs, and help overcome the dilemma of collective action, thereby realizing the integrated governance model that combines autonomy, rule of law and morality. However, as an informal institutional arrangement, the points-based system can sustain rural self-governance only if it is embedded within the formal institutional framework of China’s current rural governance, forming a long-term governance mechanism. Moreover, the successful experience of the points-based governance system in Village L does not necessarily guarantee its replicability elsewhere; its application should be adapted to local contexts and socio-economic conditions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈实.“小积分”何以撬动“大治理”:乡村自主性建构的行动框架[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2025(6):127-136

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-04
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码