The Law on Rural Collective Economic Organizations establishes that the legal benchmark for public interest litigation concerning rural women is any act of membership determination which occurs when the confirmation process itself infringes upon their legitimate rights and interests，and emphasizes the public interest of lawsuits that “cause damage to the social public interest”， thereby elevating the “soft law” advocacy of gender equality into the “hard law” deterrence of public interest litigation.The procuratorial organs exercising supervisory power on behalf of state public authority， represent a judicial means with governance attributes. At the substantive level，administrative “correction” is the primary choice， while at the procedural level， it exhibits significant non-litigious characteristics.In response to practical challenges， it is essential to uphold the coordination and unification of gender equality and production efficiency in rural areas， further refine the initiation standards for public interest litigation concerning rural women， and fully protect both the rights and interests of rural women and social public interests while maintaining judicial modesty.Emphasis should be placed on fully leveraging the judicial spillover effects of such public interest litigation， generating institutional rules through judicial practice and advancing the transformation of modernizing primary-level governance.