“榜”治:乡村积分治理的仪式化实践与互构机制
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

华中科技大学 社会学院,湖北 武汉 430074

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

C912.82

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金青年项目“情感能量视角下乡村教师教育质量提升的精准支持研究”(23CSH041)。


“Bang” Governance: Ritualized Practice and State-Society Interaction in Rural Points-Based Governance
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    积分榜治是围绕“榜”开展的治理实践,是积分制治理的延伸和超越。研究对浙江省Z村的“榜”治实践展开个案分析,以“在场”为核心概念,并基于传播与仪式的理论,探讨“榜”在乡村治理中的实践过程及内在机制。研究发现,“榜”治通过立“榜”、登“榜”、活“榜”的仪式化过程,实现物质、身体、意义三重在场。在该仪式化实践过程中,“榜”促成了国家-社会双向互构机制:行政力量通过符号转译与仪式操演将制度文本转化为文化认同;自治主体借助人情面子动员强化了村社共同体意识。但“榜”治的治理效能依赖于熟人社会、乡村能人的仪式创造力及持续性的互动仪式。研究进一步揭示,“榜”治实现了技术治理与文化治理的范式升级,既破解技术治理的“指标悬浮”困境,又化解文化治理的主体缺位,同时弥合“国家-社会”关系的张力。基于此,研究尝试性提出“榜”治的“技术-文化-关系”三维解释框架,为理解乡村治理创新提供新的理论透镜。

    Abstract:

    “Bang”(Honor Board) Governance,a practice centered around “Bang”, is an extension and enhancement of points-based governance. This study conducts a case analysis of Village Z in Zhejiang Province, employing the core concept of “presence” and integrating communication and ritual theories to explore its mechanisms. The study finds that “Bang” governance achieves a three-dimensional presence—material, physical, and symbolic—through the ritualized process of establishing the list, enrolling names on it, and activating its social function. This process facilitates a bidirectional state-society mechanism: administrative forces translate institutional texts into cultural identity through symbolic translation and ritual performance, while villagers reinforce community cohesion through social norms such as Face(mianzi). However, the efficacy of “Bang” governance relies on the fabric of acquainted society, the ritual creativity of local leaders, and sustained community engagement. The study further reveals that “Bang” governance achieves a paradigm upgrade integrating technical and cultural governance: it resolves the issue of “suspended indicators”common in technical governance and passive participation in cultural governance, overcomes the absence of agency often seen in cultural governance and mitigates tensions in state-society relations. Accordingly, the study tentatively proposes a three dimensinal “technology-culture-relations” framework for understanding “Bang” governance, offering a new theoretical lens for interpreting innovation in rural governance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

万可歆,胡鹏辉.“榜”治:乡村积分治理的仪式化实践与互构机制[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2025(5):148-157

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码