农地经营权强度能提升新型农业经营主体正规信贷数量吗?——基于法律-事实-感知维度
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

华南农业大学 经济管理学院,广东 广州 510642

中图分类号:

F832.4

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金重大项目“乡村振兴与深化农地制度改革”(19ZDA115)。


Can the Intensity of Agricultural Land Management Right Increase the Number of Formal Credit for New Agricultural Operators?——Based on the Dimension of Law‒fact‒perception
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [36]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    伴随着农业现代化的发展,农地经营权的重要性愈加凸显。由于有较多的转入农地,农地经营权直接影响新型农业经营主体的正规信贷数量。产权性质的歧义和权能结构的模糊,使得农地经营权强度对正规信贷数量的影响,关系是复杂的,路径是模糊的。从法律、事实和感知3个维度,理论分析农地经营权的强度与新型农业经营主体的正规信贷数量的关系。运用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA),分析农地经营权影响新型农业经营主体正规信贷数量的组态路径。结果表明:尽管尚未完善,但法律维度的农地经营权强度已显示出对提升新型农业经营主体正规信贷数量的显著作用;由于配套改革的不完善等问题,农地经营权强度的事实维度和感知维度对提升新型农业经营主体正规信贷数量仅发挥了一定的辅助作用。由此认为要强化农地经营权,不仅要进一步推进农地经营权的法律改革,还要强化农地经营权的事实维度即保障新型农业经营主体对转入农地的实际权利,提升新型农业经营主体对农地经营权强度的安全感知。

    Abstract:

    Since the new agricultural operator rents a substantial amount of land,its loans,especially the institutional loans,are directly affected by the agricultural land management right. However,both the nature and the capacity structure of the land management right are ambiguous,making the relationship between the intensity of land management rights and the new agricultural operator’s institutional loans complex and hard to identify the causal path. This paper theoretically analyses the intensity of the agricultural land management right from dimension of law, fact and perception.With the help of the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis method(fsQCA),this paper digs out the configuration of the influence of the intensity of agricultural land management right on the new agricultural operator.It shows the law is not yet perfect now,but it has played an essential role in promoting the new agricultural operator’s institutional loans.The local infrastructure of agricultural land management rights is imperfect,so the capacity of fact dimension to improve the new agriculture operator’s institutional loans is limited.The perception of new agriculture operators is weak,which restricts the function of the perception dimension to promote the new agricultural operators’ institutional loans.This research’s policy implication means that strengthening the intensity of the agriculture management right need not only to perfect the agricultural land law but also to protect the new agricultural operators’ rights and enhance their perception of agricultural land management rights.

    参考文献
    [1] 郭庆海.新型农业经营主体功能定位及成长的制度供给[J].中国农村经济,2013(4):4-11.
    [2] 经济日报新型农业经营主体发展指数调查课题组.加大新型农业经营主体的金融创新支持力度[N]. 经济日报,2019-06-28(15).
    [3] 林乐芬,法宁.新型农业经营主体融资难的深层原因及化解路径[J].南京社会科学,2015(7):150-156.
    [4] 付兵涛.农业弱质性与农村金融体系建设[J].中国金融,2008(8):76-77.
    [5] 王蔷,郭晓鸣.新型农业经营主体融资需求研究——基于四川省的问卷分析[J].财经科学,2017(8):118-132.
    [6] 张林,温涛.农村金融发展的现实困境、模式创新与政策协同——基于产业融合视角[J].财经问题研究,2019(2):53-62.
    [7] 罗兴,马九杰.不同土地流转模式下的农地经营权抵押属性比较[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(2):22-32.
    [8] BESLEY T J,BURCHARDI K B,GHATAK M.Incentives and the DE Soto effect[J].The quarterly journal of economics,2012,127(1):237-282.
    [9] MéNARD C,SHIRLEY M M.The contribution of Douglass North to new institutional economics[M]//GALIANI S,SENED I.Institutions,property rights,and economic growth:the legacy of Douglass North.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2014:11-29.
    [10] DEININGER K,JIN S.Tenure security and land-related investment:evidence from Ethiopia[J].European economic review,2006,50(5):1245-1277.
    [11] NGUYEN T T.Land reform and farm production in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam[J].Asian economic journal,2012,26(1):43-61.
    [12] KEMPER N,HA L V,KLUMP R.Property rights and consumption volatility:evidence from a land reform in Vietnam[J].World development,2015,71:107-130.
    [13] 肖鹏.土地经营权的性质研究——基于土地经营权抵押贷款规范性文件的分析[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(9):12-18.
    [14] 吴一恒,马贤磊,马佳,等.如何提高农地经营权作为抵押品的有效性?——基于外部治理环境与内部治理结构的分析[J].中国农村经济,2020(8):40-53.
    [15] 丁文.论“三权分置”中的土地经营权[J].清华法学,2018,12(1):114-128.
    [16] 单平基.“三权分置”中土地经营权债权定性的证成[J].法学,2018(10):37-51.
    [17] 陈小君.土地改革之“三权分置”入法及其实现障碍的解除——评《农村土地承包法修正案》[J].学术月刊,2019(1):87-95.
    [18] FURUBOTN E G.PEJOVICH S.Property rights and economic theory:a survey of recent literature[J].Journal of economic literature,1972,10(4):1137-1162.
    [19] ALCHIAN A A.Some economics of property rights[J].IL Politico,1965,30(4):816-829.
    [20] 罗必良.产权强度与农民的土地权益:一个引论[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(5):7-12.
    [21] ABERRA A,CHEMIN M.Does legal represent increase investment?Evidence from a field experiment in kenya[J].Journal of development economics,2021(64):102-612.
    [22] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1979.
    [23] BRASSELLE A S,GASPART F,PLATTEAU J P.Land tenure security and investment incentives:puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso[J].Journal of development economics,2002,67(2):373-418.
    [24] 田传浩.土地制度兴衰探源[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2018.
    [25] 申静,王汉生.集体产权在中国乡村生活中的实践逻辑——社会学视角下的产权建构过程[J].社会学研究,2005(1):113-148.
    [26] VAN GELDER J L.Feeling and thinking:quantifying the relationship between perceived tenure security and housing improvement in an informal neighborhoods in Buenos Aires[J].Habitat international,2007,31(2):219-231.
    [27] 吉登艳,马贤磊,石晓平.土地产权安全对土地投资的影响:一个文献综述[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014(3):52-61.
    [28] 胡新艳,洪炜杰,米运生,等.土地价值、社会资本与农户农地抵押贷款可得性[J].金融经济学研究,2016,31(5):117-128.
    [29] BERG-SCHLOSSER D,MEUR G DE.Comparative research design:case and variable selections[M]//RIHOUX B,RAGIN C C.Configurational comparative methods:Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related technique.Washington DC:Sage,2009:19-32.
    [30] LESLIE T.Essays in political economy[M].Dublin:Hodges,Foster&Figgis,1888:212.
    [31] RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2008.
    [32] SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-Theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2012.
    [33] 曾华盛,谭砚文.农村金融改革中“一证两中心”体制的成效及存在问题——以广东省德庆县为例[J].武汉金融,2017(5):58-60.
    [34] 杨宜音.“自己人”:信任建构过程的个案研究[J].社会学研究,1999(2):40-54.
    [35] 庄贵军,席酉民.关系营销在中国的文化基础[J].管理世界,2003(10):98-109.
    [36] BRAUMOELLER B F.Guarding against false positives in Qualitative Comparative Analysis[J].Political analysis,2015,23(4):471-487.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

米运生,张轶之,郭金海.农地经营权强度能提升新型农业经营主体正规信贷数量吗?——基于法律-事实-感知维度[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(1):186-196

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:718
  • 下载次数: 589
  • HTML阅读次数: 576
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-11
文章二维码