抑制或促进?劳动力外流对农村人情消费的影响研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“有限知识视角下农户技术采纳决策的动态仿真与实证研究”(71863006);国家社会科学基金项目“城市移民乡土情结、‘反哺’行为与宅基地退出障碍研究”(19BGL217)。


Inhibitory or Contributory?Study of the Impact of Labor Mobility on Expenditure on Social Relations in Rural China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    人情消费是中国乡村维持社会联系的重要传统,如今却愈发成为农村家庭沉重的经济负担,农村劳动力外流可能对原有社会人情关系产生不确定性影响。文章首先从人情关系网络视角出发分析中国乡村人情消费独特的内在逻辑以及在此逻辑下不同务工类型(就近务工和离乡务工)可能对乡村社会人情关系带来的冲击;继而基于中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)微观数据,采用多值处理效应模型实证分析不同务工类型对农民家庭人情消费的实际影响,并进一步从地区和农户异质性两个方面讨论劳动力外流对农民家庭人情消费的影响差异。研究表明,不同务工类型对农民家庭的人情消费的影响各异,表现为就近务工对农民家庭的人情消费的影响并不显著,而离乡务工对人情消费有显著的抑制作用,意味着离乡务工可能会瓦解或重塑农户原有的乡村社会人情关系,并可能会改变人情消费的方式。此外,农民务工对人情消费的作用效果在不同经济发展水平的区域也存在差异;离乡务工对人情消费的抑制作用在年轻一代的农民家庭中表现更为明显;受教育程度越高的农户,其表现出的抑制效应也越大。

    Abstract:

    Expenditure on “Renqing” (social relations) is an important tradition of maintaining social ties in rural China, but it has become a heavy economic burden for contemporary rural families. Farmers’ migrant work may have uncertain effects on the original social relationships. From the perspective of the social network of “Renqing” relationship, this paper first analyzes the unique internal logic of China’s rural “Renqing” expenditure, and the impact of different types of labor emigration (nearby work and migrant work) on rural social relations. Then, based on the micro data of Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS), a Multivalued Treatment Effects Model was used to empirically analyze the actual impact of different types of labor emigration on the “Renqing” expenditure of farmers, and this paper further discusses the different effects of labor emigration on “Renqing” expenditure in terms of regional heterogeneity and farmers’ heterogeneity.The results of this study show that different types of labor emigration have different effects on the “Renqing” expenditure. It shows that working in the vicinity of farmers’ households does not significantly affect the “Renqing” expenditure, while working far from their households has a significant inhibitory effect on “Renqing” expenditure. It means that migrant work may disintegrate or reshape the original rural social relations of farmers and may change the form of “Renqing” expenditure. In addition, the effect of labor emigration on “Renqing” expenditure is also different in regions with different economic development levels; and the inhibitory effect of migrant work on “Renqing” expenditure is more obvious in the younger group; education may increase the inhibitory effect of migrant work on “Renqing” expenditure.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱月季,杨琦,刘玲.抑制或促进?劳动力外流对农村人情消费的影响研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(5):136-147

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-22
  • 出版日期: