Based on statistical investigation,this paper concludes that “capital to the countryside” can not only be conducive to the increase of farmer’s income and employment,but also do harm to farmers.From farmer’s perspective,“capital to the countryside” is good and they are willing to lease their land to the enterprises going to the countryside and work for these enterprises.If their decision-making rights and profit rights are ensured,farmers highly praise “capital to the countryside” and they have strong willingness to lease their land.Therefore,“capital to the countryside” itself is not awful and it is awful only because farmer’s rights and interests are not guaranteed.The “capital to the countryside” should begin with establishing the mechanism for sharing and increasing revenue,improving the degree of organization and political participation of farmers,perfecting the social security system and strengthening regulatory aspects.Most importantly,the protection of farmers’ rights and interests should be set as the starting point and foothold to push forward“capital to the countryside”.